ArticleBiomedical optics express2025
Quantifying ocular microaberration using a high-resolution Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To quantify high-spatial-frequency wavefront errors caused by microaberration, we developed a high-resolution (20 µm) Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor (SHWFS). This system was designed using a small lenslet array (100 µm) and a large CMOS sensor (24.6 × 32.8 mm), incorporating 5× pupil magnification. Measurements were performed on 20 normal subjects aged 25 to 60 years, all without clinically evident corneal scars or cataracts. Examinations were performed under cycloplegia with a 4.5-mm pupil diameter. Ocular wavefronts were reconstructed using both modal and zonal methods, derived from the same local wavefront slopes measured by each lenslet. To isolate high-frequency wavefront errors due to microaberration, the modal wavefront was subtracted from the zonal wavefront, and the resulting root mean square (RMS) was calculated as a metric of microaberration-induced wavefront distortions. The mean RMS values increased with age: 13.5 ± 1.1 nm in the 20s, 14.1 ± 0.7 nm in the 30s, 15.9 ± 1.3 nm in the 40s, and 16.3 ± 1.5 nm in the 50s, showing a strong correlation with age (R
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.