Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40809962›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2025

Poncia Nyembo Kasongo, Pierre Mahou, Jean-Marc Sintès, Gaël Latour, Marie-Claire Schanne-Klein

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Erratum:Biomedical optics express · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Poncia Nyembo KasongoLaboratory for Optics and Biosciences (LOB), École Polytechnique, CNRS, Inserm, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, 91120 Palaiseau, France.
Pierre MahouLaboratory for Optics and Biosciences (LOB), École Polytechnique, CNRS, Inserm, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, 91120 Palaiseau, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4452-1011
Jean-Marc SintèsLaboratory for Optics and Biosciences (LOB), École Polytechnique, CNRS, Inserm, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, 91120 Palaiseau, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8337-3982
Gaël LatourLaboratory for Optics and Biosciences (LOB), École Polytechnique, CNRS, Inserm, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, 91120 Palaiseau, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6244-6556
Marie-Claire Schanne-KleinLaboratory for Optics and Biosciences (LOB), École Polytechnique, CNRS, Inserm, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, 91120 Palaiseau, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3026-8932

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human cornea is a highly organized tissue, which comprises hundreds of 1-3 µm thick stacked collagen lamellae. However, this microstructure is poorly characterized and requires further investigation. Polarization-resolved second harmonic generation (pSHG) microscopy is a powerful technique for this purpose because of its specificity for collagen and its sensitivity to its orientation. However, pSHG is prone to spatial resolution degradation with depth unless the immersion refractive index is matched to that of the sample, which is critical for corneas that are approximately 600 µm thick. In the absence of experimental data on the refractive index along the entire cornea, we propose a measurement method that applies to the entire cornea directly under the microscope objective. We then use an iodixanol solution to match the refractive index of the immersion medium to that of the cornea. Finally, we carefully characterize the pSHG orientation data obtained under these optimal conditions, and we show that they provide a better resolution along the entire thickness of the cornea and a better determination of the lamellae orientation.

Identifiers

PMID40809962
PMCPMC12339295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.