ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2025
Socioeconomic disparities in incidence, treatment, and survival of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: insights from a nationwide cohort study in Sweden.
Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Does Surgical Approach Influence Benchmark Attainment in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma?World journal of surgery · 2026Article
- Impact of small area-level deprivation on survival outcomes in patients with Cholangiocarcinoma: a population-based multilevel survival analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- When social inequities dictate outcomes: the multidisciplinary call of cholangiocarcinoma.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2025Article
- Behavioral Medicine in Cholangiocarcinoma: Bridging the Gap Between Biology and Behavior.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The incidence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is rising globally, yet the role of socioeconomic status (SES) in shaping disease burden and care within universal healthcare systems remains poorly understood. This study assessed SES-related disparities in the incidence, treatment, and survival of iCCA in Sweden. Methods: National registry data were used to identify all adult cases of iCCA diagnosed from 2011 to 2021 (n = 1827). Data from the Swedish quality register for liver cancer were cross-linked with socioeconomic and healthcare registers. Household income- categorised as low (lowest national quartile), medium, or high (highest quartile)-was used as the SES indicator. Incidence rates (IRs), treatment patterns, and survival were analysed across income strata. Findings: The age-standardized IR increased from 1.35 in 2011 to 1.94 per 100,000 person-years in 2021, with the steepest rise observed among men and individuals with low income. Compared to those with high-income, individuals with low income had higher IR ratios of all-stage (1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15-1.52) and late-stage iCCA (1.46, 95% CI: 1.17-1.81). Preventable liver diseases were more prevalent in the low-income patients, while primary sclerosing cholangitis and inflammatory bowel disease were more common among high-income patients. Low income was associated with lower odds of receiving systemic therapy (adjusted odds ratio 0.54, 95% CI: 0.38-0.77) and higher mortality risk among those treated (adjusted hazard ratio 1.34, 95% CI: 1.09-1.65). Interpretation: Despite universal healthcare access, substantial socioeconomic disparities persist in the incidence, treatment, and outcomes of iCCA in Sweden. Funding: The Swedish Cancer Society and The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.