ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
The relationship between frailty in older adults and anxiety and depression in china: propensity score matching and network analysis.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Anxiety and depression are common mental disorders in the elderly. Concurrent frailty may lead to worse clinical outcomes. This study examined the network structures of anxiety and depression in frail and non-frail older adults. Methods: The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale-10 (CESD-10) and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-7 (GAD-7) were used to measure depressive and anxiety symptoms, respectively. Following propensity score matching (PSM), 877 frail elderly individuals were matched with 877 non-frail elderly individuals. Central (influential) and bridge symptoms were estimated using the expected influence (EI) and bridge expected influence (bridge EI), respectively. Network stability was assessed using the case-dropping bootstrap method. Results: Based on the NCT results, there were no significant differences in the comparison of the network models between the non-frailty group and the frailty group in terms of global strength (7.175 vs. 7.136, S = 0.039, P = 0.802) and network structure (M = 0.137, P = 0.703). There were also no significant differences in edge weights between the networks of the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: NCT results showed no significant difference in the network structure of anxiety and depression between frail elderly and control groups. A slight decrease in network strength was observed in non-frail elderly but was not statistically significant. Both groups showed similar characteristics in bridging symptoms, central symptoms, overall strength, and network structure. Interventions for anxiety and depression are equally beneficial for both frail and non-frail elderly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.