Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40809845›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in genetics2025

MicroRNAs as novel biomarkers for prenatal fetal congenital heart disease - systematic literature review.

Adrianna Kondracka, Paulina Gil-Kulik, Magda Rybak-Krzyszkowska, Jakub Staniczek, Anna Oniszczuk, Bartosz Kondracki

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Adrianna KondrackaDepartment of Obstetrics and Pathology of Pregnancy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Paulina Gil-KulikDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Magda Rybak-KrzyszkowskaDepartment of Obstetrics, Perinatology University Hospital, Kraków, Poland.
Jakub StaniczekChair and Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecological Oncology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Anna OniszczukDepartment of Inorganic Chemistry, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Bartosz KondrackiDepartment of Cardiology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: CHD accounts for about one-third of all congenital malformations and is the leading cause of infant mortality. Currently, the primary method for diagnosing CHD during pregnancy is fetal echocardiography. Several studies have observed significant differences in the expression levels of specific miRNAs between CHD fetuses and normal fetuses. This systematic review explores the potential of miRNAs as non-invasive biomarkers for the prenatal detection of CHD in fetuses. Material and methods: The systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines, conducting a detailed search across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science using predefined terms related to microRNAs and congenital heart defects. Inclusion was limited to original, full-text articles in English, while non-English studies, reviews, and inaccessible full texts were excluded. Data extraction and quality assessment using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale ensured comprehensive evaluation and minimized bias. Results: Studies explored the potential of miRNAs as biomarkers for detecting congenital heart defects (CHD) in fetuses, employing diverse sample types such as maternal serum, umbilical cord blood, and amniotic fluid. Diagnostic methods primarily included fetal echocardiography, complemented by postnatal confirmation through surgery or autopsy. Gestational ages at sample collection ranged predominantly from the second trimester (16-27 weeks) to narrower windows, reflecting methodological variability across studies. The included studies utilized advanced technologies, such as next-generation sequencing (e.g., Illumina HiSeq, NovaSeq) and microarrays, for discovery-phase experiments, while validation predominantly employed qRT-PCR techniques. Identified miRNAs showed heterogeneity in expression patterns and diagnostic potential, with several studies reporting high sensitivity, specificity, and AUC values for specific miRNAs like miR-146a-5p and miR-142-5p. While some miRNAs demonstrated exceptional diagnostic accuracy, others were only described in terms of differential expression, highlighting the variability and complexity of miRNA biomarker discovery for CHD. Conslusion: The findings of this systematic literature review provide evidence that some miRNAs could serve as non-invasive biomarkers for the early detection of CHD in fetuses. However, each of the reviewed studies identified different miRNAs as potential biomarkers. This variability may stem from differences in experimental methodologies, including approaches to miRNA isolation, quantification techniques, and the types of biological materials analyzed. Such methodological heterogeneity, combined with small sample sizes and the diverse spectrum of CHDs, underscores the need for caution in interpreting these findings. At this stage, it is not feasible to translate these results into clinical practice or establish standardized miRNA-based prenatal screening protocols.

Indexed as

amniotic fluidbiomarkerscongenital heart defects (CHD)fetal echocardiographymaternal serummicroRNAs (miRNAs)prenatal diagnosisumbilical cord blood

Identifiers

PMID40809845
PMCPMC12343255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.