ArticleJournal of plankton research
Distribution patterns and driving mechanisms of ciliate communities from continental shelf to deep basin of the Northeastern South China Sea.
Article in Journal of plankton research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ciliates are common components of microplankton and play crucial roles in the marine microbial food web, but little is known regarding how community assembly and species association vary from shelf to basin. A survey of ciliate diversity was conducted in the northeastern South China Sea during the winter of 2013, and the spatial distribution, driving mechanisms and network relationships of ciliate community were revealed. Our results showed that ciliate community compositions were similar between continental shelf and basin areas but significantly different between photic and aphotic waters. Higher ciliate abundances were found in shelf and photic waters than in basin and aphotic waters, primarily due to differences in light, nutrients and food resources. Across the entire sea area, environmental factors had a more significant influence on communities than spatial factors, suggesting that deterministic processes played a significant role in ciliate distribution. Co-occurrence network analysis revealed that ciliate networks were more stable in basin and photic waters than in shelf and aphotic waters, which was probably related to more complex relationships in the former two waters. Combined with the broader niche breadth, our study suggested that the ciliate community in basin and photic waters would show a stronger defense capability against environmental changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.