Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40809787›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2025

Enabling in vivo comparisons of different four-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging sequences for radiotherapy guidance using visual biofeedback.

Katrinus Keijnemans, Tim Schakel, Bastien Lecoeur, Pim T S Borman, William A Hall, Bas W Raaymakers, Andreas Wetscherek, Eric S Paulson, Martin F Fast

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Katrinus KeijnemansDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, The Netherlands.
Tim SchakelDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, The Netherlands.
Bastien LecoeurJoint Department of Physics at The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, 15 Cotswold Rd, London, SM2 5NG, United Kingdom.
Pim T S BormanDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, The Netherlands.
William A HallDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI 53226, United States of America.
Bas W RaaymakersDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, The Netherlands.
Andreas WetscherekJoint Department of Physics at The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, 15 Cotswold Rd, London, SM2 5NG, United Kingdom.
Eric S PaulsonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI 53226, United States of America.
Martin F FastDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Managing respiratory motion is essential for effective radiotherapy in the abdominothoracic regions. Respiratory-correlated four-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (4D-MRI) can provide accurate motion estimation to help define treatment volumes for adaptive radiotherapy. However, validating and comparing 4D-MRI sequences in vivo is challenging due to the presence of breathing variability. This study combines visual biofeedback (VBF) with 4D-MRI sequences to facilitate in vivo comparisons. Materials and Methods: Fourteen healthy volunteers and one patient were scanned on a 1.5 T Unity MR-linear accelerator (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) at two institutions. A radial stack-of-stars (SoS), a simultaneous multi-slice (SMS), and a Cartesian acquisition with spiral ordering (CASPR) 4D-MRI sequence were acquired. These acquisitions were performed without and with VBF based on an interleaved one-dimensional respiratory navigator (1D-RNAV) acquisition. Breathing variability across sequences was quantified using 1D-RNAV-derived breathing waveforms. Reconstructed 4D-MRI data were used to extract the motion amplitude, which was compared intra-volunteer across sequences and to the amplitudes of the breathing waveforms. Results: Breathing variability across sequences decreased by 37% (amplitude, Conclusions: This methodology enables in vivo comparisons of 4D-MRI sequences for adaptive radiotherapy, with guidance improving anatomical consistency and ensuring more reliable comparisons.

Indexed as

4D-MRIIn vivoMR-linacRadiotherapyVisual biofeedback

Identifiers

PMID40809787
PMCPMC12347986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.