ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Health needs assessment: development of a simplified risk probability scale design for rapid mental health screening in emergency frontline rescue teams.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-driven early detection of severe influenza in Jiangsu, China: a deep learning model validated through the design of multi-center clinical trials and prospective real-world deployment.Frontiers in public health · 2025Trial
- Self-management and role of nurses of diabetic patients: a critical narrative literature review during COVID-19 pandemic.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Emergency frontline rescue workers during the COVID-19 pandemic faced elevated psychological risks, yet existing tools lack specificity for crisis contexts. Aim: To develop a simplified risk probability scale (SRPS) tailored for rapid self-assessment of depression and anxiety in frontline rescue teams. Methods: This SRPS study employed a mixed research methodology of questionnaires and systematic reviews. Snowball sampling was applied to collect questionnaire data. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify key variables for the SRPS, which was then established using binary logistic regression models and nomograms. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves evaluated the SRPS's accuracy and sensitivity. A literature review of existing COVID-19 assessment tools in the PubMed database was also carried out. Ethics and dissemination: The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University (IRB No: YKL08-002). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier [ChiCTR2500103976].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.