ArticleCardiology research2025
Effect of Hyperperfusion on Successful Collection of Arterial Blood Gas Specimens in Patients With Acute Heart Failure.
Article in Cardiology research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to explore the effect of radial artery flow hyperperfusion on the successful collection of radial artery blood gas specimens in patients with acute heart failure. Methods: From February 2023 to December 2024, 548 patients with acute heart failure in the database of the emergency rescue room of our hospital were divided into two groups: non-hyperperfusion group and hyperperfusion group. In the hyperperfusion group, arterial blood gas was collected using the radial artery hyperinfusion method (improving radial artery perfusion by blocking arteries other than the radial artery in the forearm using a customized sphygmomanometer with a double-airbag hollow cuff). The primary endpoint was the success rate of one-time puncture and the success rate of total puncture. Secondary endpoints included puncture frequency of > 3 times, puncture time, pain, puncture site hematoma, puncture site bruise, and patients' satisfaction. Results: In total, 548 patients were included, including 325 in the non-hyperperfusion group and 223 in the hyperperfusion group. The hyperperfusion group exhibited a significantly higher success rate of one-time puncture (63.4% vs. 83.4%, P< 0.001) and success rate of total puncture (82.5% vs. 94.6%, P < 0.001) compared to the non-hyperperfusion group. Additionally, the hyperperfusion group experienced a significantly reduced number of patients with puncture frequency > 3 times (26.2% vs. 9.9%, P < 0.001) and puncture time (48.59 ± 7.83 s vs. 26.43 ± 6.44 s, P < 0.001). This approach also effectively decreased the risk of puncture site hematoma (2.2% vs. 0.0%, P = 0.045), arm puncture place bruise (5.5% vs. 0.4%, P<0.001), and pain (3.0 (3.0, 4.0) vs. 2.0 (1.0, 2.0), P <0.001) and improved patients' satisfaction after adopting the radial artery hyperinfusion method. Conclusions: Radial artery hyperperfusion improved the success rate of puncture for radial artery blood specimen collection in patients with acute heart failure, reduced puncture complications, and improved patients' satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.