ArticleFood chemistry: X2025
Pre-harvest Chitooligosaccharide application enhances phenolic composition, antioxidant capacity, and sensory quality of cabernet Gernischt grapes (
Article in Food chemistry: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pre-Harvest Foliar Application of Chitooligosaccharide Modulates Aroma Quality of Cabernet Gernischt Wines.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comparative Profiling of Aroma Volatiles and Flavonoid Biosynthesis in Crimson Seedless, Red Globe, and Shine Muscat Table Grapes Using GC-IMS and RNA-Seq.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluates the effects of pre-harvest chitooligosaccharide (COS) application on the quality of Cabernet Gernischt grapes and wine. Grapevines were sprayed with 0.37 mM COS and 0.1 % Tween 80 at fruit expansion (CE), veraison (CV), and maturity (CM) stages, for the control (CK), water was used with 0.1 % Tween 80. Post-harvest, the physicochemical properties, phenolic composition, antioxidant capacity, color attributes, and sensory characteristics of the grapes and wine were analyzed. COS treatment promoted the physicochemical indicators, phenolic substances, antioxidant capacity and color quality of grapes compared to CK, thus improving the quality of wine. Sensory evaluation showed the sensory quality of wine treated with COS is superior to that of CK, especially for the CM stage produced the best sensory quality. These findings demonstrate that COS is an effective plant elicitor for enhancing red wine grape and wine quality, offering a practical approach to improving sensory and physicochemical attributes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.