ReviewFood chemistry: X2025
A comprehensive review of post-harvest agricultural product deterioration signature volatile organic compounds.
Review in Food chemistry: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic Deterioration Pattern of Soybean Meal Contaminated byFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Dynamic Changes in Volatile Organic Compounds and Quality Traits in Two Wheat Cultivars During Grain Filling: An Integrated Volatilomics Study Using HS-GC-IMS and HS-SPME-GC-MS.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Chemical Characterization, Evaluation of Antimicrobial Potential, and Cytotoxic Activity ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Intelligent Discrimination of Grain Aging Using Volatile Organic Compound Fingerprints and Machine Learning: A Comprehensive Review.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Post-harvest management of agricultural products is crucial for minimizing spoilage and economic losses. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) have emerged as effective indicators of early-stage deterioration, offering a promising approach to improving detection methods. This review examines the role of VOCs in spoilage identification, emphasizing key markers such as terpenes, ketones, esters, and aldehydes in fruits, vegetables, grains, and legumes. Various detection techniques-including spectrometry, electronic noses, spectroscopy, and sensor arrays-are evaluated and compared for their potential to assess spoilage and freshness by correlating their limits of detection (LOD) with typical VOC concentrations in agricultural scenarios. Future development trend in VOC research focus on enhancing sensor sensitivity, developing portable detection devices, integrating VOC monitoring with smart systems, and leveraging artificial intelligence for predictive analysis. These advancements aim to optimize post-harvest management strategies and improve food safety through more accurate and timely spoilage detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.