ReviewCureus2025
Clinical Outcomes and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery Techniques Over the Past Decade.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Modified suture-assisted penetrating canaloplasty vs. compound trabeculectomy in treating primary angle-closure glaucoma.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) has revolutionized glaucoma management over the past decade by offering safer, more efficient alternatives to traditional surgeries such as trabeculectomy. This review synthesizes clinical and patient-reported outcomes from 40 studies published between 2014 and 2025. MIGS techniques, including trabecular meshwork bypass stents (e.g., iStent, Hydrus), suprachoroidal shunts (e.g., CyPass), and subconjunctival devices (e.g., Xen), achieve intraocular pressure (IOP) reductions of 15-50%, reduce medication dependence by 0.4-1.8 drugs, and exhibit low complication rates (e.g., hyphema: ≤20%; hypotony: ≤15.4%). Combined MIGS-cataract procedures outperform standalone MIGS, with superior IOP control (additional 2-2.8 mmHg reduction) and lower reoperation rates (3% vs. 24% at two years). Patient-reported outcomes, though understudied, indicate enhanced quality of life, visual function, and ocular surface health. Challenges include variability in device efficacy and limited long-term data. Future research should prioritize standardized patient-reported metrics and diverse populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.