ArticleCureus2025
Implementing Quick Response (QR)-Coded Patient Information Leaflets to Reduce Environmental Impact in Urology Outpatient Clinics: A Pilot Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aim Patient information leaflets (PILs) printed in paper form are a commonly used adjunct tool in urology clinics. These help to facilitate the information transfer between doctor and patient. They are detrimental to the environment and costly. Quick response (QR) codes can be used as another option for delivering the leaflets and would reduce the environmental burden. The aim of this paper is to evaluate patient response to the introduction of QR codes as a replacement for paper-based PILs. Methods This pilot study followed the introduction of QR codes of commonly used leaflets sourced from the British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS). The study was conducted in a urology clinic at the Hereford County Hospital over a one-month period. The acceptability of the QR codes was recorded. Data such as patient demographics and the type of leaflet were also documented and tabulated. Results Thirty-one patients required PILs, out of which 80% agreed to PILs via QR codes. The mean age of the participating patients was 76. The replacement of paper with QR codes for the one-month period reflects an average estimated saving of 1.88 kg of carbon dioxide emissions and around 238 sheets of paper. Discussion The introduction of QR codes has seen an increase in most sectors, including, more recently, the medical industry. They can be used with a wide range of functions within the industry ranging from medical education to patient identification. These can also be more easily distributed in various forms to cater to all needs. Limitations, such as the currently limited variety of urology PILs available, also need to be considered. Conclusion QR codes of the PILs are a generally accepted alternative. The widespread introduction of QR codes reduces the total environmental impact of paper documents while also reducing production costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.