Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40809632›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Implementing Quick Response (QR)-Coded Patient Information Leaflets to Reduce Environmental Impact in Urology Outpatient Clinics: A Pilot Study.

Ana Matei, Yew Fung Chin, Thomas Hughes, Wasim Mahmalji

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ana MateiUrology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, GBR.
Yew Fung ChinGeneral Surgery, New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton, GBR.
Thomas HughesUrology, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, GBR.
Wasim MahmaljiUrology, Hereford County Hospital, Hereford, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aim Patient information leaflets (PILs) printed in paper form are a commonly used adjunct tool in urology clinics. These help to facilitate the information transfer between doctor and patient. They are detrimental to the environment and costly. Quick response (QR) codes can be used as another option for delivering the leaflets and would reduce the environmental burden. The aim of this paper is to evaluate patient response to the introduction of QR codes as a replacement for paper-based PILs. Methods This pilot study followed the introduction of QR codes of commonly used leaflets sourced from the British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS). The study was conducted in a urology clinic at the Hereford County Hospital over a one-month period. The acceptability of the QR codes was recorded. Data such as patient demographics and the type of leaflet were also documented and tabulated. Results Thirty-one patients required PILs, out of which 80% agreed to PILs via QR codes. The mean age of the participating patients was 76. The replacement of paper with QR codes for the one-month period reflects an average estimated saving of 1.88 kg of carbon dioxide emissions and around 238 sheets of paper. Discussion The introduction of QR codes has seen an increase in most sectors, including, more recently, the medical industry. They can be used with a wide range of functions within the industry ranging from medical education to patient identification. These can also be more easily distributed in various forms to cater to all needs. Limitations, such as the currently limited variety of urology PILs available, also need to be considered. Conclusion QR codes of the PILs are a generally accepted alternative. The widespread introduction of QR codes reduces the total environmental impact of paper documents while also reducing production costs.

Indexed as

carbon dioxide emissionsenvironment friendlyinformational leafletsquick response (qr) codesurology clinicurology patients

Identifiers

PMID40809632
PMCPMC12345384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.