Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40809607›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Thoracic Segmental Spinal Anesthesia for Upper Thoracic Spine Fractures: A Case Series.

Richa Chandra, Luiz E Imbelloni, Imran Ahmed Khan, Anmol Singh

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Richa ChandraAnesthesiology, Rohilkhand Medical College and Hospital, Bareilly, IND.
Luiz E ImbelloniAnesthesiology, Independent Researcher, Rio de Janeiro, BRA.
Imran Ahmed KhanCommunity Medicine, KMC Medical College and Hospital, Maharajganj, IND.
Anmol SinghAnesthesiology, Adesh Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Bathinda, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unstable upper thoracic spine (T1-T6) fractures pose a considerable challenge in their management. These cases are often complicated by associated injuries. These types of thoracic fractures need early stabilization and surgical fixation, which have been shown to improve recovery and accelerate neurological outcomes. Traditional general anesthesia (GA) with endotracheal intubation carries risks of postoperative pulmonary complications in patients with chest injuries or comorbidities. Spinal anesthesia (SA) has advantages over GA in terms of decreased blood loss, early enhanced recovery, and reduced risk of hazards associated with the prone position. Thoracic segmental SA (TSSA), which involves the targeted administration of local anesthetic near the surgical site, provides effective pain relief and allows for awake prone positioning without intraoperative complications or the need for conversion to GA. This case series explores the feasibility and safety of TSSA for the surgical fixation of unstable upper thoracic spine fractures in five patients with significant comorbidities, including chest injuries and cardiovascular or respiratory issues. Postoperative courses were uneventful, with no neurological deterioration or need for mechanical ventilation at follow-up (13-30 months). These preliminary findings suggest TSSA as a potential alternative to GA for high-risk patients undergoing upper thoracic spine surgery, but larger, controlled trials are needed to establish its efficacy and safety.

Indexed as

comorbiditieshigh-risk patientsregional anesthesiaspinal cordthoracic segmental spinal anesthesiaupper thoracic spine fractures

Identifiers

PMID40809607
PMCPMC12349739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.