Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40809606›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Improved Femoroacetabular Range of Motion in Runners Following the Spencer Technique for the Hip: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Zachary J Buchman, Benjamin M Vinarski, Jason S DeFrancisis, Dante DiSilvestro, Daniel P Oar, Jack T Carter, Jesse T O'Rorke, David Boesler, James Toldi, Rebecca E Steiner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zachary J BuchmanPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Bradenton, USA.
Benjamin M VinarskiOrthopedic Surgery, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Bradenton, USA.
Jason S DeFrancisisOrthopedic Surgery, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Bradenton, USA.
Dante DiSilvestroMedicine, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Bradenton, USA.
Daniel P OarMedicine, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Bradenton, USA.
Jack T CarterMedicine, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Bradenton, USA.
Jesse T O'RorkeMedicine, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Bradenton, USA.
David BoeslerOsteopathic Medicine, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Bradenton, USA.
James ToldiSports Medicine, Lincoln Memorial University DeBusk College of Osteopathic Medicine, Orange Park, USA.
Rebecca E SteinerMedicine, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Bradenton, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Spencer technique of the hip is an osteopathic manipulative technique used to treat somatic dysfunction and increase hip range of motion (ROM), including flexion, extension, internal rotation, external rotation, abduction, and adduction. The application of this osteopathic manipulative technique in runners versus non-runners to assess potential differences in improvements of femoroacetabular ROM has not been clinically investigated in existing literature.

objectiveThe goal of this research was to determine if the application of the Spencer technique of the hip improves femoroacetabular ROM in runners compared to non-runners. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this retrospective analysis of results from a randomized controlled trial, the effects of the Spencer technique on the hip were investigated in nine runners and eleven non-runners (n = 20). The Spencer technique of the hip was performed on all participants twice per week for four weeks. Participants were retrospectively categorized into either "runners" or "non-runners" groups based on self-reported exercise habits during the treatment period. "Runners" self-reported running a ten-minute mile, or faster, on at least two days per week for at least two of the four weeks investigated, whereas those in the "non-runners" group did not report exercising to this threshold. Before and after the four-week treatment period, goniometer ROM measurements were recorded. Using averaged bilateral data, the average percent change over the four weeks for each motion was compared between the two groups using a two-sample, two-tailed t-test.

resultsOne significant difference was found comparing the average percentage change of hip internal rotation over four weeks of treatment in runners (+31.7% ± 29.8) compared to non-runners (-8.6% ± 17.8) for a difference of 40.3% (95% CI: (15.40, 65.20), p = 0.001). The average percent change over the four weeks for all other motions (flexion, extension, external rotation, abduction, and adduction) when compared between groups demonstrated no significant difference (p > 0.05).

conclusionsThe results obtained in this study indicate that exercise programs that rely more on aerobic training may play a significant role in the impact of the Spencer technique therapy on the femoroacetabular joint, specifically in internal rotation. These findings are limited by a small sample size (n = 20) and restricted participant demographics (strictly medical students aged 21-30), creating the need for samples of larger quantity and greater diversity in future studies of this topic. These findings may help osteopathic physicians more effectively utilize the Spencer technique when treating their diverse patient populations with varying aerobic exercise habits.

Indexed as

athletic performancefemoroacetabular jointmusculoskeletal medicineomt in sportorthopedic sports medicineosteopathic manipulative medicineosteopathic manipulative treatment (omt)physical medicine and rehabilitationspencer techniquespencer technique of the hip

Identifiers

PMID40809606
PMCPMC12348213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.