Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40809583›Full record

ArticleAfrican health sciences2024

Clinicopathological spectrum and outcome of appendicectomy at a South African tertiary hospital: continuing impact of delayed presentation.

P B Simelane, S S Kader, T E Madiba

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in African health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

P B SimelaneDepartment of Surgery, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban.
S S KaderDepartment of Surgery, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban.
T E MadibaDepartment of Surgery, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Appendicitis is a common surgical emergency, associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Aim: To describe the clinicopathological spectrum and outcome of appendicitis in our setting. Methods: Retrospective descriptive chart review of patients undergoing surgery for appendicitis over two study periods (Group A: 2010-2012 and Group B: 2016-2018). Data collected included demographics, clinical presentation, operative findings and outcome. Results: There were 229 patients in Group A [median age 24 (IQR 18-32) years] and 145 in Group B [median age 28 (IQR 20-36) years]. Median pre-hospital delay was 3 days for Group A 3 (IQR 2-4) and 1 day for Group B 1 (IQR 1-2). Complicated appendicitis occurred in 69 (30.1%) and 37 (25.5%) patients in Group A and B respectively. Post-operative complication rate was 18.3% and 8.3 % in Groups A and B respectively. Postoperative mortality in Group A was 3.5% and 2 1% for Group B. Delay in presentation was associated with increased complicated appendicitis. Conclusion: Complicated appendicitis was seen in one third of the patients in both groups. Delay in presentation persists in our setting and it is associated with complicated appendicitis, which carries an increased morbidity and mortality.

Indexed as

AppendectomyAppendicitisPostoperative ComplicationsTime-to-TreatmentAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesSouth AfricaTertiary Care CentersTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAppendicitiscomplicated appendicitistreatment outcomes

Identifiers

PMID40809583
PMCPMC12341187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.