ReviewFrontiers in surgery2025
The evolution of personalized stroke thrombectomy.
Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prediction of catheter navigation difficulty during mechanical thrombectomy using CTA-based carotid siphon morphometry.Frontiers in medical technology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stroke is a leading cause of disability and death worldwide, with acute ischemic stroke accounting for most cases. Mechanical thrombectomy is a widely accepted treatment modality in appropriately selected patients, demonstrating improved functional outcomes through safe and effective recanalization. However, traditional trials have focused on a narrow subset of patients, limiting its applicability to diverse populations who would otherwise benefit from thrombectomy. Advances in neurovascular imaging, device innovation, and procedural techniques are driving a paradigm shift toward personalized stroke thrombectomy. This review explores personalization strategies across various domains, including lesion-specific considerations such as medium vessel occlusions (MeVOs), basilar artery occlusions (BAOs), and tandem lesions, as well as patient-specific factors like infarct size, low NIHSS scores, advanced age, and unique biomarkers. Additionally, we discuss procedural innovations, such as tailored device use and alternative access strategies to address anatomical and clinical complexities. While substantial progress has been made, challenges remain in refining patient selection criteria, mitigating procedural risks, and ensuring equitable access to thrombectomy. Future directions include taking full advantage of advanced imaging modalities, incorporating biomarkers for personalized care, and optimizing thrombectomy devices to support the use of thrombectomy in underrepresented populations. Precision thrombectomy has the potential to be adapted to a broader spectrum of patients, improving outcomes and ultimately reducing the global burden of stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.