Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40809481›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in systems biology2023

Systems biology platform for efficient development and translation of multitargeted therapeutics.

Karim Azer, Irina Leaf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in systems biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Karim AzerAxcella Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Irina LeafAxcella Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Failure to achieve efficacy is among the top, if not the most common reason for clinical trial failures. While there may be many underlying contributors to these failures, selecting the right mechanistic hypothesis, the right dose, or the right patient population are the main culprits. Systems biology is an inter-disciplinary field at the intersection of biology and mathematics that has the growing potential to increase probability of success in clinical trials, delivering a data-driven matching of the right mechanism to the right patient, at the right dose. Moreover, as part of successful selection of targets for a therapeutic area, systems biology is a prime approach to development of combination therapies to combating complex diseases, where single targets have failed to achieve sufficient efficacy in the clinic. Systems biology approaches have become increasingly powerful with the progress in molecular and computational methods and represent a novel innovative tool to tackle the complex mechanisms of human disease biology, linking it to clinical phenotypes and optimizing multiple steps of drug discovery and development. With increasing ability of probing biology at a cellular and organ level with omics technologies, systems biology is here to stay and is positioned to be one of the key pillars of drug discovery and development, predicting and advancing the best therapies that can be combined together for an optimal pharmacological effect in the clinic. Here we describe a systems biology platform with a stepwise approach that starts with characterization of the key pathways contributing to the Mechanism of Disease (MOD) and is followed by identification, design, optimization, and translation into the clinic of the best therapies that are able to reverse disease-related pathological mechanisms through one or multiple Mechanisms of Action (MOA).

Indexed as

disease modellingdrug developmentdrug discoverymetabolomicsplatformsystems biologysystems pharmacology

Identifiers

PMID40809481
PMCPMC12341954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.