ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025
An fMRI study of crossmodal emotional congruency and the role of semantic content in the aesthetic appreciation of naturalistic art.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Numerous studies have explored crossmodal correspondences, yet have so far lacked insight into how crossmodal correspondences influence audiovisual emotional integration and aesthetic beauty. Our study investigated the behavioral and neural underpinnings of audiovisual emotional congruency in art perception. Participants viewed 'happy' or 'sad' paintings in an unimodal (visual) condition or paired with congruent or incongruent music (crossmodal condition). In the crossmodal condition, the music could be emotionally congruent (e.g., happy painting, happy music) or incongruent with the painting (e.g., happy painting, sad music). We also created Fourier Scrambled versions of each painting to test for the influence of semantics. We tested 21 participants with fMRI while they rated the presentations. Beauty ratings did not differ for unimodal and crossmodal presentations (when aggregating across incongruent and congruent crossmodal presentations). We found that crossmodal conditions activated sensory and emotion-processing areas. When zooming in on the crossmodal conditions, the results revealed that emotional congruency between the visual and auditory information resulted in higher beauty ratings than incongruent pairs. Furthermore, semantic information enhanced beauty ratings in congruent trials, which elicited distinct activations in related sensory areas, emotion-processing areas, and frontal areas for cognitive processing. The significant interaction effect for Congruency × Semantics, controlling for low-level features like color and brightness, observed in the behavioral results was further revealed in the fMRI findings, which showed heightened activation in the ventral stream and emotion-related areas for the congruent conditions. This demonstrates that emotional congruency not only increased beauty ratings but also increased the in-depth processing of the paintings. For incongruent versus congruent comparisons, the results suggest that a frontoparietal network and caudate may be involved in emotional incongruency. Our study reveals specific neural mechanisms, like ventral stream activation, that connect emotional congruency with aesthetic judgments in crossmodal experiences. This study contributes to the fields of art perception, neuroaesthetics, and audiovisual affective integration by using naturalistic art stimuli in combination with behavioral and fMRI analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.