Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40809366›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2025

The effect of sampling methods on the validity and reliability of the estimation of the orbital stability of human gait.

Jeongin Moon, Jooeun Ahn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jeongin MoonDepartment of Physical Education, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1190-8837
Jooeun AhnDepartment of Physical Education, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7964-5148

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Floquet multiplier (FM) is a commonly used metric for evaluating gait orbital stability in biomechanics. However, variability of human gait and noise from various sources can induce significant bias and variance in the estimation of FM. Furthermore, FM is employed in gait analysis without standardized protocols, leading to highly case-dependent outcomes. To address these challenges, we quantify the effects of sampling conditions on the accuracy and consistency of FM estimations. We recruited 20 healthy participants and conducted five trials of 10 minutes of walking per participant. Using individualized Jacobian matrices calculated from the walking experiments, we synthesized multiple sets of virtual time series with varying lengths and trial counts. Using stochastic linear models, we simulated the error dynamics depending on the sampling methods. The bias and variance of FM estimates decreased as the time series lengthened, achieving a strong correlation with the true value after 140 strides for 14-dimensional state vector. Our results further suggest that partitioning a long time series into appropriately sized segments can yield more reliable FM estimates, reducing both bias and variance in FM estimations.

Indexed as

bias and variance reductionFloquet multipliergait orbital stabilitysampling conditionsstochastic linear model

Identifiers

PMID40809366
PMCPMC12344288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.