ArticleRoyal Society open science2025
Does the tail show when the nose knows? Artificial intelligence outperforms human experts at predicting detection dogs finding their target through tail kinematics.
Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Does the tail show when the nose knows? Artificial intelligence outperforms human experts at predicting detection dogs finding their target through tail kinematics.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- Faces of time: a historical overview of rapid innovations in coding animal facial signals.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Detection dogs are utilized for searching and alerting to various substances due to their olfactory abilities. Dog trainers report being able to 'predict' such identification based on subtle behavioural changes, such as tail movement. This study investigated tail kinematic patterns of dogs during a detection task, using computer vision to detect tail movement. Eight dogs searched for a target odour on a search wall, alerting to its presence by standing still. Dogs' detection accuracy against a distractor odour was 100% with trained concentration, while during threshold assessment, it progressively reached 50%. In the target odour area, dogs exhibited a higher left-sided tail-wagging amplitude. An artificial intelligence (AI) model showed a 77% accuracy score in the classification, and, in line with the dogs' performance, progressively decreased at lower odour concentrations. Additionally, we compared the performance of an AI classification model to that of 190 detection dog handlers in determining when a dog was in the vicinity of a target odour. The AI model outperformed dog professionals, correctly classifying 66% against 46% of videos. These findings indicate the potential of AI-enhanced techniques to reveal new insights into dogs' behavioural repertoire during odour discrimination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.