ArticleFrontiers in sociology2025
The role of hope in bullying and cyberbullying prevention.
Article in Frontiers in sociology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Research is clear that the cognitive-motivational internal asset of hope is significantly related to enhanced life satisfaction and psychological wellbeing. It has also shown promise in preventing participation in a variety of negative externalizing behaviors, especially antisociality, maladaptive coping, and various forms of aggression among young people. The current exploration evaluates the relationship between hope and youth participation in bullying and cyberbullying. Materials and methods: A nationally representative survey was conducted in spring 2019 among 5,569 U.S. students aged 12-17 (mean age 14.4) to examine bullying and cyberbullying offending, with 2,472 respondents completing Snyder's six-item Children's Hope Scale. The study measured participation in eight forms of school-based bullying and twelve forms of cyberbullying in the previous 30 days, and controlled for demographic variables including age, gender, race, and sexual orientation. Results: The study found that 16.5% of students participated in school bullying behaviors and 10.7% in cyberbullying behaviors in the previous 30 days. Name-calling was the most common form of school bullying (16%), while making others feel left out was the most frequent form of cyberbullying (10.1%). Statistical analyses revealed that male students were more likely to engage in both forms of bullying. Importantly, higher levels of hope were associated with significantly lower participation in both school bullying and cyberbullying behaviors. Discussion: Findings indicate that hope has an inverse relationship with school bullying and cyberbullying behaviors among US youth, suggesting that fostering hope could help reduce these forms of interpersonal aggression. Specifically, schools should prioritize hope-building through the cultivation of one-on-one relationships, the use of scenario-based learning, and the implementation of supportive-cooperative interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.