ArticleClinical neurophysiology practice2025
COMPRESSIVE DATA STORAGE FOR LONG-TERM EEG: VALIDATION BY VISUAL ANALYSIS.
Article in Clinical neurophysiology practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Long-term EEG monitoring (LTM) in acute neurology generates massive data volumes. We investigated whether data-analytic techniques could reduce LTM data size yet conserve their visual diagnostic features. Methods: LTM exemplars from 50 patients underwent singular value decomposition (SVD). High-variance SVD components were transformed using discrete cosine transform (DCT), and significant elements run-length encoded. Two regimes were tested: (I) SVD and DCT compression ratio (CR) of 1.7 and 12, and (II) CR of 3.7 and 5.7; each achieved an overall CR of ≈20. Compressed data were reconstructed alongside uncompressed originals, to create a total of 200 recordings that were scored by two blinded reviewers. Scores of original and reconstructed data were statistically analyzed. Results: Score differences between original recordings were smaller than comparisons involving reconstructions using the first regime but did not differ significantly from reconstructions using the second regime. Conclusions: Raw LTM EEG has sufficient redundancy to undergo extreme (20-fold) data compression without compromising visual diagnostic information. A balanced mix of SVD and DCT appears to be a suitable data-analytic pipeline for achieving such compression. Significance: Dimension reduction is a significant goal in managing big biomedical data. Our results suggest a pathway for archival of meaningful representations of entire LTM datasets. The latent space suggests new lines of data-scientific inquiry of the EEG in acute neurological illness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.