ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2025
Accuracy of Caregiver-Reported Height, Weight, and BMI in a Pediatric Growth Clinic.
Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Accuracy of parent- and self-reported height and weight data in children: a systematic review.European journal of public health · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of caregiver-reported height, weight, and body mass index (BMI) in children attending a pediatric growth clinic, and to explore the impact of these errors on clinical management and telemedicine. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 132 children aged 6-12 years attending a pediatric growth clinic. Caregivers reported their children's height and weight, and standard measurements were taken within one week. BMI was calculated for both sets of data. Differences between caregiver-reported and standard measurements were analyzed across gender and age. Bland-Altman and linear regression analyses assessed agreement and correlation. Results: Caregivers slightly overestimated height (+0.6 cm) and underestimated weight (-0.9 kg), resulting in an underestimation of BMI (-0.6 kg/m², p < 0.001). About 4.5% of overweight children were misclassified as non-overweight. Measurement errors showed no significant differences by gender or age group. Most caregivers measured their children's height and weight approximately once per month, regardless of subgroup. Despite minor discrepancies, caregiver-reported and standard data were strongly correlated Conclusion: While caregiver-reported measurements exhibited minor errors, the magnitude was comparable to previous findings in general pediatric populations. Thus, caregiver-reported data may be suitable for follow-up monitoring in pediatric growth clinics but should be used cautiously for initial diagnosis or therapeutic decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.