Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40809276›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025

The impact of donor-recipient size mismatch on lung transplant outcomes.

Claudia Poo-Fernández, David Iturbe-Fernández, Sandra Tello-Mena, Sheila Izquierdo-Cuervo, Laura Sánchez-Moreno, Diego A Murillo-Brito, Sara Naranjo-Gozalo, Roberto Mons-Lera, Pilar Alonso-Lecue, José M Cifrián-Martínez and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Claudia Poo-FernándezRespiratory Department, Lung Transplant Unit, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Santander, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6251-6323
David Iturbe-FernándezRespiratory Department, Lung Transplant Unit, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Santander, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5241-266X
Sandra Tello-MenaRespiratory Department, Lung Transplant Unit, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Santander, Spain.
Sheila Izquierdo-CuervoRespiratory Department, Lung Transplant Unit, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Santander, Spain.
Laura Sánchez-MorenoValdecilla Research Institute (IDIVAL), Santander, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5732-3797
Diego A Murillo-BritoThoracic Surgery, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Santander, Spain.
Sara Naranjo-GozaloValdecilla Research Institute (IDIVAL), Santander, Spain.
Roberto Mons-LeraValdecilla Research Institute (IDIVAL), Santander, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3005-6157
Pilar Alonso-LecueValdecilla Research Institute (IDIVAL), Santander, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8696-3435
José M Cifrián-MartínezRespiratory Department, Lung Transplant Unit, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Santander, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3682-0142
Amaya Martínez-MeñacaRespiratory Department, Lung Transplant Unit, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Santander, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4141-8887
Víctor M Mora-CuestaRespiratory Department, Lung Transplant Unit, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Santander, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8161-0462

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Lung transplantation (LT) represents a critical therapeutic intervention for advanced chronic lung diseases. This study aims to elucidate the prognostic implications of donor-recipient size matching, specifically focusing on the ratio of predicted total lung capacity (pTLC). Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of 380 transplant recipients at a single LT center from January 2015 to October 2023. Patients were stratified based on size discrepancies exceeding 10% and 20%, calculated using two established formulas. Results: Our findings indicate that significant size mismatches do not correlate with adverse post-transplant outcomes, including primary graft dysfunction (PGD), duration of mechanical ventilation, or overall survival rates. Notably, a size discrepancy greater than 20% utilizing the first formula emerged as an independent risk factor for the composite outcome of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) and mortality. While the majority of donor-recipient pairings were of the same sex, sex mismatch significantly influenced size discrepancies. Furthermore, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients demonstrated elevated pTLC ratios compared to those with interstitial lung disease (ILD), underscoring the complexity inherent in size matching across different pathologies. Conclusions: Our data suggests that significant size discrepancies between donor and recipient do not adversely impact immediate outcomes in LT recipients, but it may have significant long-term implications; therefore, appropriate donor size selection for each recipient is essential. The use of pTLC formulas can be helpful for estimating the suitable size.

Indexed as

chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD)donorlung transplantation (LT)recipientSize matching

Identifiers

PMID40809276
PMCPMC12340290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.