Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40809275›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025

A population-based nomogram for prognostic assessment in advanced lung cancer following progression with immune checkpoint inhibitor.

Tianwei Luo, Huiyu Li, Ao Chen, Ting Ouyang, Meijuan Wu, Mi Yang, Chao Chen, Xiaoyuan Chu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tianwei Luo *Department of Oncology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Clinical College, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Huiyu Li *Department of Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Jinling Clinical Medical College, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Ao ChenDepartment of Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Jinling Clinical Medical College, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Ting OuyangDepartment of Oncology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Clinical College, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Meijuan WuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Mi YangDepartment of Oncology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Clinical College, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Chao ChenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Xiaoyuan ChuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The complexity of immunoresistance patterns in advanced lung cancer (LC) and the uniqueness of its efficacy response (e.g., pseudoprogression and hyperprogression) make it difficult to standardize treatment regimens after progression. This study aimed to analyze the independent factors after progression of immunotherapy in LC patients and to construct and validate a visual evaluation tool for assisting clinical prediction of prognosis. Methods: A total of 245 LC patients who progressed after receiving single or combination immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) therapy in Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University between January 2019 and February 2024 were enrolled for retrospective analysis. The nomogram was created based on the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and multivariate Cox regression analysis to predict overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in R software. The time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUCs), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to assess the discrimination, accuracy, and clinical utility of the prediction models. Results: Four independent factors significantly associated with OS were utilized to create a nomogram to predict OS: platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) level, smoking history, immune combination regimen, and liver metastasis factors. Three variables significantly associated with PFS were incorporated into the development of a nomogram for predicting PFS: PLR level, smoking history, and tumor stage. The results of the calibration curves showed that the predictive probabilities of the nomogram for OS and PFS were consistent with the observational data, with the C-indexes of the nomogram for predicting OS and PFS being 0.643 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.592-0.695] and 0.588 (95% CI: 0.541-0.636), respectively. The AUCs for predicting the 12-month, 24-month, and 36-month OS and PFS were 0.681 and 0.763, 0.795 and 0.637, 0.649 and 0.694, respectively. The DCA curves indicated that the nomogram for OS had good net benefits. Compared to the high-risk group, the OS and PFS were significantly prolonged in the low-risk group. Conclusions: The novel nomogram for predicting the prognosis of advanced LC patients after progression with ICIs provides a scientific basis and an important reference for the development of individualized treatment strategies. Our study revealed that PLR level, smoking history, and liver metastasis were significant prognostic indicators. In the future, specific treatment options that could prolong patients' OS and PFS need to be further explored.

Indexed as

immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)Lung cancer (LC)nomogramprognosis

Identifiers

PMID40809275
PMCPMC12340266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.