ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025
A novel stepwise and continuous high-volume irrigation drainage technique for managing cervical anastomotic leaks post-esophagectomy.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Recently, minimally invasive surgical modalities have become the mainstream approach for the treatment of esophageal cancer, but the incidence rate of anastomotic leak (AL) has not significantly decreased. Compared to intrathoracic anastomoses, cervical anastomotic leaks (CALs) occur at a higher rate. However, there is still a lack of consensus regarding the local management for CALs. In recent years, we have innovated an irrigation and drainage technique for patients with CALs. The aim of this article is to investigate the therapeutic effect of this novel technique. Methods: The current study was designed as a retrospective study. Patients with CALs in Shanghai Changzheng Hospital were included consecutively. Data regarding healing time (HT), frequency of dressing changes (DC), post-operative hospital stay, mortality, morbidity, as well as laboratory indicators, such as white blood cell count (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) were recorded. Results: The current study included a total of 53 patients with CALs. Among them, 26 patients received conventional DC treatment (DC group), while 27 patients were treated with irrigation and drainage treatment (IDT) group. IDT significantly expedited the HT of CALs (45 Conclusions: The irrigation and drainage technique is an effective treatment for CALs and merits broad implementation within clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.