ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025
Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery simple versus complex segmentectomy: a retrospective comparative study on mid-term surgical and early oncological outcomes.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Perioperative Outcomes of Complex Versus Simple Segmentectomy Via Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery for Lung Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Complex versus simple segmentectomy in non-small cell lung cancer: a single-center, retrospective study.General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Undertaking a complex segmentectomy using uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) involves greater technical complexity compared to a simple segmentectomy or lobectomy. This study aimed to investigate a series of cases wherein uniportal VATS complex segmentectomy was performed more frequently than uniportal VATS simple segmentectomy, to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the complex procedure by presenting mid-term surgical and early oncological outcomes. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent either simple or complex segmentectomy using uniportal VATS from May 2019 to December 2024. Patient and tumor characteristics, as well as operative and postoperative outcomes, were compared between simple and complex segmentectomy groups. Recurrence patterns and early oncological outcomes were also assessed. Results: Of the 513 patients analyzed, 135 received a simple segmentectomy and 355 underwent a complex segmentectomy, both performed using the uniportal VATS approach. While most clinical, tumor-related, and perioperative variables did not differ significantly between the two groups, notable differences were observed in the duration of postoperative hospitalization and the incidence of postoperative bleeding. Contrary to our previous observations, uniportal VATS complex segmentectomy did not result in shorter surgical margin distances. In subgroup analysis, among 181 patients who underwent postoperative surveillance with chest computed tomography for at least 2 years, we noted one recurrence, with an additional case of recurrence identified 5 months postoperatively. One case occurred in the complex segmentectomy group, and the other occurred in the basal segmentectomy group. Both recurrent cases consisted of moderately differentiated adenocarcinomas with a consolidation to tumor ratio (C/T ratio) ≥0.5 despite achieving adequate surgical margins. Conclusions: Uniportal VATS complex segmentectomy demonstrated a favorable safety profile and oncological efficacy comparable to simple segmentectomy. The low incidence of recurrence observed in this study suggests that complex segmentectomy represents a viable surgical option with acceptable mid-term surgical and early oncological outcomes. Further studies with longer follow-up periods are warranted to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.