Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40809213›Full record

ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2025

State-of-the-art artificial intelligence methods for pre-operative planning of cardiothoracic surgery and interventions: a narrative review.

Quinten J Mank, Abdullah Thabit, Alexander P W M Maat, Sabrina Siregar, Edris A F Mahtab, Theo van Walsum, Amir H Sadeghi, Jolanda Kluin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Quinten J MankDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4223-6632
Abdullah ThabitBiomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Alexander P W M MaatDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Sabrina SiregarDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Edris A F MahtabDepartment of Cardiothoracic surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Theo van WalsumBiomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Amir H SadeghiDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jolanda KluinDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: Artificial intelligence (AI) has been increasingly explored as a tool to enhance clinical decision-making and optimize and speed up preoperative planning in cardiothoracic surgery. By improving precision and efficiency, AI has the potential to streamline workflows and improve outcomes. This study aimed to examine the current applications of AI in preoperative planning for cardiothoracic procedures. Methods: We systematically reviewed the literature in PubMed. Two search strings were employed to identify research articles related to AI applications in preoperative cardiothoracic surgery planning published up to August 2024. Studies were screened, and articles were included based on predefined criteria. Key Content and Findings: A total of 525 articles were extracted from the PubMed database. After applying exclusion criteria and analyzing the articles, 32 articles were included. These articles were categorized into and described according to their application: aortic (valve) surgery/intervention, mitral valve surgery/intervention, other cardiac surgeries, and lung, thoracic wall, and mediastinal surgeries. Key AI applications included segmentation of anatomical structures, tumor detection, prosthesis sizing for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), and automated measurement of surgical parameters. The reviewed studies demonstrated that AI could increase segmentation accuracy, reduce preoperative planning time, and automate critical steps in surgical preparation. Conclusions: AI has been introduced in preoperative planning for cardiothoracic procedures to support clinicians by increasing segmentation accuracy, reducing preoperative planning time, and automating several preoperative planning steps such as tumor detection, TAVI prosthesis sizing and other planning measurements. However, the widespread adoption faces several challenges, including the need for robust validation, regulatory approval, and integration into clinical workflows. Additionally, the implementation of AI involves substantial costs, including investments in software development, computational infrastructure, and training of clinical staff. Future research should focus not only on advancing AI technology but also on evaluating the cost-effectiveness to ensure it delivers measurable benefits while remaining accessible and sustainable for healthcare systems. Addressing these issues is essential to realize the full potential of AI in cardiothoracic surgery.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence (AI)Cardiothoracic surgery (CTS)deep learning (DL)machine learning (ML)surgical planning

Identifiers

PMID40809213
PMCPMC12340272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.