ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2025
State-of-the-art artificial intelligence methods for pre-operative planning of cardiothoracic surgery and interventions: a narrative review.
Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- 1,357 AI medical devices cleared, 3 actually tested on patient outcomes.PLOS digital health · 2026Review
- Deep Learning and Cardiovascular Diseases: An Updated Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Oncologic Thoracic Surgery: Clinical Decision Support and Emerging Applications.Cancers · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in cardiovascular medicine: prevention, diagnosis, and intervention.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Review
- The future of lung cancer surgery lies between innovations: synergy across the perioperative ERATS pathway.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Use of Artificial Intelligence in Preoperative Planning in Surgery: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2026Review
- Reliability of Immersive Virtual Reality for Pre-Procedural Planning for TAVI: A CT-Based Validation.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Artificial intelligence (AI) has been increasingly explored as a tool to enhance clinical decision-making and optimize and speed up preoperative planning in cardiothoracic surgery. By improving precision and efficiency, AI has the potential to streamline workflows and improve outcomes. This study aimed to examine the current applications of AI in preoperative planning for cardiothoracic procedures. Methods: We systematically reviewed the literature in PubMed. Two search strings were employed to identify research articles related to AI applications in preoperative cardiothoracic surgery planning published up to August 2024. Studies were screened, and articles were included based on predefined criteria. Key Content and Findings: A total of 525 articles were extracted from the PubMed database. After applying exclusion criteria and analyzing the articles, 32 articles were included. These articles were categorized into and described according to their application: aortic (valve) surgery/intervention, mitral valve surgery/intervention, other cardiac surgeries, and lung, thoracic wall, and mediastinal surgeries. Key AI applications included segmentation of anatomical structures, tumor detection, prosthesis sizing for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), and automated measurement of surgical parameters. The reviewed studies demonstrated that AI could increase segmentation accuracy, reduce preoperative planning time, and automate critical steps in surgical preparation. Conclusions: AI has been introduced in preoperative planning for cardiothoracic procedures to support clinicians by increasing segmentation accuracy, reducing preoperative planning time, and automating several preoperative planning steps such as tumor detection, TAVI prosthesis sizing and other planning measurements. However, the widespread adoption faces several challenges, including the need for robust validation, regulatory approval, and integration into clinical workflows. Additionally, the implementation of AI involves substantial costs, including investments in software development, computational infrastructure, and training of clinical staff. Future research should focus not only on advancing AI technology but also on evaluating the cost-effectiveness to ensure it delivers measurable benefits while remaining accessible and sustainable for healthcare systems. Addressing these issues is essential to realize the full potential of AI in cardiothoracic surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.