ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2025
Hemodynamic effects of high spinal anesthesia under general anesthesia in infants undergoing cardiac surgery: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: High spinal anesthesia (HSA), in combination with general anesthesia (GA), has been proposed as a technique to reduce the surgical stress response while minimizing opioid use in cardiac surgery. However, concerns remain regarding the potential for HSA-induced hemodynamic instability, particularly in infants with congenital heart disease. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the impact of HSA on hemodynamic parameters in infants undergoing cardiac surgery. Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary medical center and included pediatric patients aged 1 to 12 months who underwent non-emergent cardiac surgery between November 2010 and November 2021. Patients with a Risk Adjustment for Congenital Heart Surgery-1 (RACHS-1) score greater than 3 and those who received other forms of regional anesthesia were excluded. The study compared patients who received HSA combined with GA (HSA group) to those who received GA alone (GA group). The primary outcome was the incidence of sustained hypotension and bradycardia within the first 60 minutes post-anesthesia induction, using mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) as indicators. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative pressor use, as well as average MAP and HR during the 60-minute post-anesthesia induction period. Results: A total of 202 cases were analyzed, comprising 51 in the HSA group and 151 in the GA group. The incidence of sustained hypotension did not differ significantly between the HSA and GA groups [39.2% Conclusions: Adding HSA to GA in infants undergoing non-emergent fast-track cardiac surgery appears to be as clinically safe as GA alone with respect to hemodynamic stability, as assessed by MAP and HR within the first 60 minutes after anesthesia induction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.