ArticleBlood neoplasia2025
Real-world outcomes with ibrutinib in relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma: a Danish population-based study.
Article in Blood neoplasia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- CD20 negativity at the start of second-line therapy predicts a shorter overall survival in B-cell lymphomas.Blood neoplasia · 2026Article
- The role of time to first progression and fitness status in elderly patients with mantle cell lymphoma: Results from the ELDERLY MANTLE-FIRST study.HemaSphere · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ibrutinib was approved for relapsed/refractory (R/R) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) based on high response rates in clinical trials, but it is unclear how effective ibrutinib is in the real-world setting. This study provides population-based response rates and survival estimates and characterization of prognostic indicators and adverse events (AEs) to ibrutinib for patients with R/R MCL. All patients diagnosed with MCL in Denmark from 2010 to 2022 were identified in the Danish Lymphoma Registry and screened for eligibility. Data were collected from health records. Patients receiving ibrutinib in second or later lines were included and followed from ibrutinib start until death or last follow-up. End points were overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), frequency of AEs, and AE-related discontinuation and dose reductions. In total, 146 patients were included (median age, 73 years); 90 (62%) received ibrutinib in second line. ORR was 56%, median PFS 5.8 months, and median OS 12.0 months. In Cox regressions, factors associated with inferior PFS were Ki67 of ≥50% (hazard ratio [HR], 2.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.47-3.71), blastoid or pleomorphic subtype (HR, 3.00; 95% CI, 2.04-4.41), early relapses (HR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.15-2.36), and refractory disease (HR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.07-2.30). Three-year cumulative incidences of discontinuation and dose reductions owing to AEs were 19% and 22%, respectively. Median OS after ibrutinib discontinuation was 1.9 months. In conclusion, real-world outcomes after initiation of ibrutinib for R/R MCL were poorer than observed in clinical trials, and dose-limiting toxicities were common, emphasizing the need for more effective treatments and dose-optimization studies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.