Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40809154›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine research2025

Office-Based Middle Ear Surgery Under Local Anesthesia: A Contemporary Review.

Naif Bawazeer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Naif BawazeerDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery and Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 21955, Saudi Arabia. Email: nabawazeer@uqu.edu.sa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Middle ear surgery is a daily routine procedure in otolaryngology. Pain control, along with a bloodless and non-moving operative field during the surgery, is crucial for achieving better surgical outcomes and can be achieved easily under general anesthesia (GA). Nevertheless, local anesthesia (LA), especially if done as office-based surgery, is an ideal alternative to GA in certain scenarios. Despite the well-established nature of LA for middle ear surgery, only a small percentage of otolaryngologists choose to use it, and few publications in the literature address this topic. This article reviews the literature for the feasibility of performing middle ear surgeries in an office base setting. A scoping review of the literature was conducted on middle ear surgery under LA in an office-based setting, focusing on feasibility, advantages, surgical techniques, limitations, and outcomes, to provide a concise guide for its implementation. LA will avoid the rare but serious complications of GA, and there are cost savings of approximately 50% in LA, which is crucial for the sustainability of healthcare systems. It is an ideal alternative to GA in certain scenarios, including decreased access to operative rooms, staff shortage or contraindications for GA. Also, surgeons can appreciate hearing improvement and the need for prosthesis adjustment with instant feedback during the surgery or prevent significant complications such as a dead ear under LA. Office-based surgery for middle ear under LA is feasible and the present work offers a brief guide for beginners with some tips and tricks to ensure optimal patient care and outcomes.

Indexed as

Local anesthesiaMiddle ear surgeryOffice-based surgerySedation

Identifiers

PMID40809154
PMCPMC12339263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.