Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40809096›Full record

ArticlePlant systematics and evolution = Entwicklungsgeschichte und Systematik der Pflanzen2025

Phylogenomics and classification of Cactaceae based on hundreds of nuclear genes.

Jurriaan M de Vos, Urs Eggli, Reto Nyffeler, Isabel Larridon, Catherine McGinnie, Niroshini Epitawalage, Olivier Maurin, Félix Forest, William J Baker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant systematics and evolution = Entwicklungsgeschichte und Systematik der Pflanzen, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Nuclear Ribosomal ITS1-5.8S rDNA-ITS2 Region as a Phylogenetic Marker forInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jurriaan M de Vos *Department of Environmental Sciences - Botany, University of Basel, Schönbeinstrasse 6, 4056 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6428-7774
Urs Eggli *Sukkulenten-Sammlung Zürich, Grün Stadt Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8842-8188
Reto NyffelerDepartment of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9293-5967
Isabel LarridonRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0285-722X
Catherine McGinnieRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE UK.
Niroshini EpitawalageRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3216-7425
Olivier MaurinRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4151-6164
Félix ForestRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2004-433X
William J BakerRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6727-1831

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phylogenetic classification based on evolutionary relationships is the standard approach in systematics, but Cactaceae has posed significant challenges due to the signature of its rapid radiation: low sequence divergence hindering phylogenetic resolution and enormous species diversity hindering attempts to adequately reflect phylogenetic diversity. Previous classifications mostly relied on joint assessment of multiple phylogenetic studies and/or intuition on morphological evolution, lacking comprehensive genomic analysis. Here, we propose a revised phylogenetic classification of Cactaceae, based on the Angiosperms353 set of phylogenomic markers, including 170 species, covering close to 90% of genera and common segregates. Coalescent-based gene tree-species tree reconciliation reveals a well-resolved phylogenetic backbone, mostly congruent with a previous plastid DNA-based summary phylogeny. Some unresolved areas surrounding the subfamilies Cactoideae and Pereskioideae remain however, where gene concordance analyses reveal complex evolutionary histories. We formally recognize the four traditional subfamilies Pereskioideae, Opuntioideae, Maihuenioideae, and Cactoideae, plus Blossfeldioideae and Leuenbergerioideae. Four subfamilies are monogeneric, while within Opuntioideae, we recognize three tribes (Opuntieae, Cylindropuntieae, and Pterocacteae) and within Cactoideae, we recognize eight tribes: Lymanbensonieae, Copiapoeae, Cacteae (incl. subtribes Echinocactinae, Ferocactinae, Cactinae), Phyllocacteae (incl. subtribes Corryocactinae, newly recognized Leptocereinae, Hylocereinae, Echinocereinae), Fraileae, Rhipsalideae, Notocacteae, and Cereeae (incl. subtribes Aylosterinae, Rebutiinae, Gymnocalyciinae, Cereinae, newly recognized Reicheocactinae, Trichocereinae). Our completely revised classification for all clades includes full generic synonymy accepting 155 genera. Overall, the phylogenetic structure of Cactaceae mirrors the angiosperm-wide pattern of enigmatic, species-poor lineages dispersed amongst clades that are orders of magnitude more species rich, revealing a mix of nested, 'explosive' radiations and orphan lineages. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00606-025-01948-z.

Indexed as

Angiosperms353CactaceaeMultispecies coalescentParaphylyPhylogenetic classificationPhylogenetic conflictPhylogenomicsRapid radiation

Identifiers

PMID40809096
PMCPMC12339657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.