Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40809068›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2025

Anomaly detection and removal strategies for in-line permittivity sensor signal used in bioprocesses.

Emils Bolmanis, Selina Uhlendorff, Miriam Pein-Hackelbusch, Vytautas Galvanauskas, Oskars Grigs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emils Bolmanis *Laboratory of Bioengineering, Latvian State Institute of Wood Chemistry, Riga, Latvia.
Selina Uhlendorff *Institute for Life Science Technologies ILT.NRW, OWL University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Lemgo, Germany.
Miriam Pein-HackelbuschInstitute for Life Science Technologies ILT.NRW, OWL University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Lemgo, Germany.
Vytautas GalvanauskasDepartment of Automation, Kaunas University of Technology, Kaunas, Lithuania.
Oskars GrigsLaboratory of Bioengineering, Latvian State Institute of Wood Chemistry, Riga, Latvia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In-line sensors, which are crucial for real-time (bio-) process monitoring, can suffer from anomalies. These signal spikes and shifts compromise process control. Due to the dynamic and non-stationary nature of bioprocess signals, addressing these issues requires specialized preprocessing. However, existing anomaly detection methods often fail for real-time applications. Methods: This study addresses a common yet critical issue: developing a robust and easy-to-implement algorithm for real-time anomaly detection and removal for in-line permittivity sensor measurement. Recombinant Results and discussion: We demonstrate that our approach effectively detects and removes anomalies by compensating signal shift value, while remaining computationally efficient and practical for real-time use. It achieves an F1-score of 0.79 with a static threshold of 1.06 pF/cm and a double rolling aggregate transformer using window sizes

Indexed as

anomaly validationdielectric spectroscopydynamic thresholdin-situpermittivityPichia pastorissignal preprocessingstatic threshold

Identifiers

PMID40809068
PMCPMC12343699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.