Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40809051›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2025

Distinct bacterial community structures and arsenic biotransformation gene profiles in dust.

Yi Yin, Yu-Ting Lin, Gong-Ren Hu, Rui-Lian Yu, Xiao-Hui Sun, Yu Yan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yi YinDepartment of Environmental Science and Engineering, College of Chemical Engineering, Huaqiao University, Xiamen, China.
Yu-Ting LinDepartment of Environmental Science and Engineering, College of Chemical Engineering, Huaqiao University, Xiamen, China.
Gong-Ren HuDepartment of Environmental Science and Engineering, College of Chemical Engineering, Huaqiao University, Xiamen, China.
Rui-Lian YuDepartment of Environmental Science and Engineering, College of Chemical Engineering, Huaqiao University, Xiamen, China.
Xiao-Hui SunDepartment of Bioengineering and Biotechnology, College of Chemical Engineering, Huaqiao University, Xiamen, China.
Yu YanDepartment of Environmental Science and Engineering, College of Chemical Engineering, Huaqiao University, Xiamen, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Microorganisms, which are ubiquitous in the environment, have evolved a diverse array of arsenic biotransformation genes (ABGs). Dust harbors a wide range of microorganisms. However, the distinct characteristics of bacterial community structures and ABG profiles in dust, compared with those in other environments such as soil and water, remain poorly understood. Methods: In this study, dust samples were simultaneously collected alongside surrounding soil and seawater samples in Xiamen, a coastal city of China, to investigate the distinct profiles and potential sources of bacterial communities and ABGs in dust using 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing and metagenomic sequencing. Results and discussion: Abundant and diverse bacterial communities and ABGs were detected in dust, revealing significant differences in community structures and ABG profiles compared with those in soil and seawater. Soil was identified as the primary source for both bacterial communities and ABGs in dust through fast expectation-maximization microbial source tracking (FEAST). Acetobacteraceae, which showed significantly greater relative abundance (

Indexed as

arsenicarsenic biotransformation genesbacterial communitiesdustmetagenomes

Identifiers

PMID40809051
PMCPMC12343739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.