ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Clinicopathologic features of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in different infiltrative growth pattern.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SESCC) is defined as neoplastic lesions limited to the mucosa or submucosa regardless of the nodal status. The infiltrative growth pattern (INF) has been implicated in tumor aggressiveness and prognosis in various cancers, but the application research of INF in SESCC is still unclear. We aimed to investigate the association between INF types and clinicopathological features in SESCC. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 368 SESCC patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection and precisely defined INF classification from 2014 to 2023. INF was classified as INFa/b/c per Japanese Esophageal Society guidelines. Clinicopathological characteristics were compared across INF types using univariate analysis. Significant variables from univariate analysis were included in multivariate logistic regression to identify independent predictors of INF types. Results: Univariate analysis revealed that the INF of tumor was associated with tumor size, gross morphology, intraepithelial papillary capillary loop (IPCL), infiltration depth, lymphovascular invasion, and vertical positive margins (All Conclusion: Increased tumor size, presence of IPCL type B2, and depressed gross morphology were more indicative of INFc-type SESCC. Compared with INFa and INFb, INFc type SESCC has deeper infiltration depth and is more likely to have lymphovascular invasion and positive postoperative resection margins. Therefore, careful endoscopic visualization of tumor size, IPCL, and gross morphology can improve the prediction of INF and tumor status, facilitating informed preoperative selection of surgical approach and subsequent postoperative treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.