ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2025
Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Mix-and-Match Implantation of a Trifocal and Non-Diffractive Extended Depth of Focus IOL.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Visual Outcomes After Mix-and-Match Implantation of Trifocal and Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lenses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Pooled it
- Visual Outcomes and Patient-Reported Dysphotopsia After PanOptix and PanOptix Toric Implantation Stratified by Preoperative Chord Mu: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Article
- Early Clinical Outcomes After the Mix-and-Match Approach of Trifocal and Non-Diffractive EDOF IOL.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate cataract surgery outcomes following mix-and-match implantation of a trifocal and extended-depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL). Setting: Single center, private practice. Design: Single arm, non-interventional, ambispective study. Methods: Patients who underwent femtosecond-laser assisted cataract surgery with mix-and-match implantation of the Clareon PanOptix trifocal IOL in the non-dominant eye and Clareon Vivity EDOF IOL in the dominant eye from September 2022 to November 2023 were reviewed. Only healthy eyes with postoperative absolute spherical equivalent (SE) ≤ 0.50 diopters (D) and cylinder ≤ 0.75 D were included. At 3 months postoperatively, binocular corrected and uncorrected visual acuity at distance (CDVA and UDVA), intermediate (DCIVA and UIVA), and near (DCNVA and UNVA) along with patient-reported outcomes (QUVID and IOLSAT questionnaires) were assessed. Results: 100 eyes of 50 patients were included. Postoperatively, the mean binocular CDVA and UDVA was -0.08 ± 0.05 logMAR and -0.06 ± 0.05 logMAR, respectively. Overall, 100%, 98%, and 90% of patients achieved binocular UDVA, UIVA, and UNVA of 20/25 or better, respectively. Eighty-four percent of patients reported complete spectacle independence. Few patients were "bothered very much" by haloes, glare, or starbursts (0-4%). No patients reported dissatisfaction with their vision. Overall, 94% and 92% of patients would elect the same IOLs and recommend the same procedure to friends and family, respectively. Conclusion: Mix-and-match implantation of the Clareon PanOptix and Vivity IOLs yields good patient satisfaction potentially by combining the advantages of each lens resulting in a high degree of satisfaction and low rates of visual disturbances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.