ArticleGlobal medical genetics2025
A comprehensive comparison of third generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment efficacy and adverse events: A Bayesian meta-analysis.
Article in Global medical genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: It is a challenge for clinicians to choose the optimal third generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) treatment for individual patients. In this meta-analysis we compare the efficacy of five third-generation EGFR-TKIs, as first-line and second-line therapies for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, and their adverse events (AEs). Methods: A Bayesian hierarchical network meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the hazard ratios (HR) of first-line therapeutic effects and AEs for these third-generation EGFR-TKIs comparing with first-generation EGFR-TKIs. Additionally, a simple comparison analysis was conducted to evaluate second-line therapeutic effects. Results: All third-generation TKIs exhibited superior efficacy compared to Gefitinib in first-line treatment. Furmonertinib achieved the lowest HR in the exon 19 deletions subgroup (HR: 0.35; 95 % CI: 0.23-0.54), while Lazertinib showed the most favorable HR in the exon 21 L858R subgroup (HR: 0.44; 95 % CI: 0.28-0.70) and among patients with brain metastases (HR: 0.33; 95 % CI 0.18-0.59). In the second-line setting, Furmonertinib achieved the highest numerically objective response rate across the overall population (74.0 %; 95 % CI: 68.0-80.0 %) and all evaluated subgroups. Adverse event analysis showed that Furmonertinib had the lowest overall AE incidence, and Lazertinib had the lowest rate of high-grade (≥ grade 3) AEs. Conclusions: All third-generation EGFR-TKIs exhibited favorable efficacy in both first- and second-line settings. Differences in AE profiles were also noted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.