Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40808872›Full record

SynthesisF1000Research2025

Parents' Sharenting Behaviours: A Systematic Review of Motivations, Attitudes, Perceptions, and Impression Management Perspectives.

Saeid Motevalli, Rogayah A Razak, Richard Peter Bailey, Amalia B Madihie, Katayoun Mehdinezhadnouri, Yifei Pan

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in F1000Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Saeid MotevalliPsychology, UCSI University, Kuala Lumpur, Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur, 56000, Malaysia.
Rogayah A RazakEducation, UCSI University, Kuala Lumpur, Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur, 56000, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2968-7745
Richard Peter BaileyEducation, UCSI University, Kuala Lumpur, Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur, 56000, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4650-6392
Amalia B MadihieCounselling Programme, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, 94300, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6202-1868
Katayoun MehdinezhadnouriPsychology, UCSI University, Kuala Lumpur, Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur, 56000, Malaysia.
Yifei PanPsychology, UCSI University, Kuala Lumpur, Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur, 56000, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Sharenting involves parents sharing photos, videos, or other information about their children on their social media profiles via online platforms. Research indicated the rising prevalence of parental sharenting behaviour among various countries. Objective: The main aim of this article was to explore the role of motivations, perceptions, attitudes, and impression management on parental sharenting behaviours. Methods: A systematic review examined empirical studies published from 2019 to 2024 regarding parental motivations, attitudes, perceptions, and impression management associated with sharenting. Relevant studies were identified via Scopus and manual reference searches, with data extraction concentrating on study characteristics, demographics, objectives, design, and principal findings. Findings: Parental sharenting is motivated by intrinsic desires, social validation, and impression management, as parents curate content to improve their social image. While children value favourable representations, many object to sharing without consent. Notwithstanding privacy concerns, parents frequently prioritise advantages, raising ethical enquiries regarding children's autonomy, privacy, and digital identity in digital self-representation. Conclusion: Parental sharenting, motivated by emotional satisfaction, social validation, and impression management, frequently neglects privacy risks and ethical considerations. Such practices may compromise children's autonomy, privacy, and digital identity, resulting in conflicts with their rights. Children's varied responses underscore these dilemmas, highlighting the necessity of reconciling parental intentions with safeguarding children's digital futures and overall well-being. Recommendation: Parents should engage in mindful sharenting, policymakers must safeguard children's digital rights, professionals should enhance awareness, and researchers should investigate methods to reconcile parental desires with children's welfare.

Indexed as

AttitudeMotivationParentsChildHumansPerceptionSocial MediaAttitudeDigital ParentingGood Health and Well-beingMotivationParental MotivationsSharenting Behaviour

Identifiers

PMID40808872
PMCPMC12344405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.