Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40808857›Full record

ArticleVideo journal of sports medicine

Re-Revision ACL Reconstruction: A Double-Bundle Technique Video.

Camden Bohn, Catherine Hand, Joshua Chang, Daanish Khazi-Syed, Chase Gornbein, Thomas Moran, Brian Forsythe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Video journal of sports medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Camden BohnMidwest Orthopaedics at RUSH, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9534-5372
Catherine HandMidwest Orthopaedics at RUSH, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3328-8962
Joshua ChangMidwest Orthopaedics at RUSH, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5169-145X
Daanish Khazi-SyedMidwest Orthopaedics at RUSH, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9015-3531
Chase GornbeinMidwest Orthopaedics at RUSH, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Thomas MoranMidwest Orthopaedics at RUSH, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Brian ForsytheMidwest Orthopaedics at RUSH, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1665-5872

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are a prevalent knee injury, often requiring surgery. While single-bundle reconstruction is the most employed technique for revision procedures, the native ACL consists of 2 anatomic bundles, and the double-bundle reconstruction technique aims to more accurately replicate this native anatomy. This video demonstrates a reproducible method for performing ACL reconstruction (ACLR) utilizing the double-bundle technique. Indications: Relative indications for revision double-bundle ACLR include revision or re-revision ACLR, previous lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET), 2 to 3+ pivot shift, normal posterior tibia slope, and large lateral femoral condyles. Technique Description: Arthroscopic delineation of the ACL footprint is performed. With a curved, flexible reamer, the anteromedial socket is drilled. The posterolateral socket is reamed secondarily, providing a 2-mm bone bridge separating the 2 femoral tunnels. Two tibial tunnels are drilled under direct arthroscopic visualization. On the back table, a tibialis anterior allograft and bone-patellar tendon-bone allograft are prepared. The posterior bundle graft is initially passed. A cortical button is passed across the femoral cortex, and its position is confirmed. The anteromedial bundle graft is passed secondarily. Femoral fixation is established with a polyether ether ketone (PEEK) interference screw, and both grafts are fixed on the tibial side with a PEEK anchor. Standard closure follows, and the patient is placed in a hinged knee brace locked in extension. Results: A clinical trial including 81 patients with a mean 10.7-year follow-up indicated an 85% survival rate from needing a second revision ACLR when using an allograft. A meta-analysis by Seppänen et al indicated that the double-bundle technique was superior to the single-bundle technique in International Knee Documentation Committee subjective evaluations ( Discussion/Conclusion: Double-bundle ACLR offers significant anatomic and biomechanical benefits. In the context of re-revision ACLR, the double-bundle method provides additional collagen graft material and enhanced stability, especially in cases where concurrent LET has been performed and the posterior tibial slope remains normal. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Indexed as

anterior cruciate ligament reconstructiondouble-bundle techniquesurgical outcomessurgical technique video

Identifiers

PMID40808857
PMCPMC12344238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.