Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40808834›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025

How pet food selection attributes influence customer satisfaction and loyalty: evidence from South Korea.

Ji-Eun Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ji-Eun LeeDepartment of Bakery & Cafe, Hotel Culinary Arts & Food Service, Baekseok Culture University, Cheonan-si, Chungcheongnam-do, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study examined the impact of pet food selection attributes, including price, quality, reliability, and convenience, on customer satisfaction and loyalty in South Korea's evolving pet food market. The pet industry in South Korea is expanding rapidly, driven by changes in demographics like the rise of single-person households and aging populations. It is essential to understand consumer preferences in pet food attributes. Methods: A survey of 365 pet owners was conducted, and data were analyzed using path analysis. Results: The analysis showed that reliability and convenience play a significant role in increasing customer satisfaction and loyalty, while price and quality do not have a significant effect. Consumers value trust in product origins, brand credibility, and practical features like easy-to-store packaging. These results underscore the importance of attributes that simplify daily routines and build trust in pet food products. Discussion: These findings stress the importance of transparency in production processes and consumer-oriented product designs that meet modern demands for convenience. By prioritizing these attributes, pet food manufacturers can better align their products with changing consumer expectations, improving loyalty and strengthening their competitive position in a dynamic market. This study offers insights into how selection attributes affect customer satisfaction and loyalty, with practical implications for product development and marketing strategies in the rapidly growing pet food sector. However, the study is limited by its sample representativeness and the scope of analyzed attributes, suggesting considerable scope for future research to broaden demographic coverage and explore additional influencing factors.

Indexed as

customer loyaltycustomer satisfactionpet consumer behaviorpet foodpet food marketingselection attributesSouth Korea

Identifiers

PMID40808834
PMCPMC12343553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.