ReviewJournal of biomedical optics2025
Challenges and opportunities for new intraoperative optical techniques in the surgical treatment of pituitary adenomas: a review.
Review in Journal of biomedical optics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Impact of Intraoperative MRI on Outcomes in Pituitary Adenoma Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cureus · 2026Review
- Rebirth of an old modality: revisiting intraoperative ultrasound in pituitary surgery.Pituitary · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Significance: Surgery is a common intervention for patients with pituitary adenomas, particularly those experiencing endocrine symptoms or mass effect. Persistent challenges in pituitary surgery include the detection of small microadenomas, difficulty in discerning residual tumor from normal gland, and infiltrative adenomas. Although standard perioperative diagnostics include magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography, ultrasound imaging, and neuronavigation, some centers employ intraoperative MRI, ultrasound, and fluorescence-guided endoscopy to increase the rate of gross total resection and preserve pituitary function. However, these techniques are often limited by availability, time requirements, cost, and inability to provide histological diagnosis. Aim: This review addresses opportunities to optimize both the extent of resection and gland preservation in pituitary adenoma procedures. We discuss the existing constraints faced in pituitary surgery and showcase the current and emerging detection techniques employed in clinical practice, as well as their limitations. We also discuss newer probing approaches such as elastography and Raman spectroscopy. Approach: We outline key attributes for an ideal optical tool, considering surgical theater functionality, ergonomics, and result reliability and accuracy. Results: A case study is presented describing the recent development of a fiber-optics instrument specifically designed for endonasal applications based on clinical requirements, along with preliminary data supporting the feasibility of intraoperative implementation. Conclusions: Current imaging and navigation tools, although invaluable, have inherent limitations in resolution, integration, and molecular specificity. Raman spectroscopy offers a promising, label-free method for real-time tissue identification, especially when integrated into fiber-optic probes for endonasal use. As a complementary tool, it could enhance intraoperative decision-making and surgical precision. Further clinical validation is needed to support its integration into standard workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.