Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40808827›Full record

ReviewJHLT open2025

To build a better VAD: What is needed to make MCS truly competitive with cardiac transplantation for long-term outcomes?

Jennifer A Cowger, Evgenij Potapov

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JHLT open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jennifer A CowgerDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Henry Ford Health, Michigan State University and Wayne State University, Detroit, MI.
Evgenij PotapovDeutsches Herzzentrum der Charité, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While average survival in patients undergoing durable left ventricular assist device (dLVAD) support now approximate 6 years, the application of therapy remains limited across the globe. Herein we highlight important deficiencies common to present technology and propose device innovations and field corrections that will be necessary to improve acceptance of dLVAD support by both patients and medical providers caring for patients with end-stage heart failure. Pragmatic trials will also be needed to help identify the therapeutic strategy (permanent dLVAD support vs heart transplant vs dLVAD as a bridge to transplant) that affords the best outcomes for a patient's risk profile and total survival goals.

Indexed as

Adverse eventsHeart failureHeart transplantLVADOutcomesSurvival

Identifiers

PMID40808827
PMCPMC12343477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.