Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40808798›Full record

ArticleStatistica Sinica2025

High-dimensional Subgroup Regression Analysis.

Fei Jiang, Lu Tian, Jian Kang, Lexin Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistica Sinica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fei JiangUniversity of California at San Francesco, Stanford University.
Lu TianUniversity of California at San Francesco, Stanford University.
Jian KangUniversity of California at San Francesco, Stanford University.
Lexin LiUniversity of California at San Francesco, Stanford University.

Funding

Statistical ICA Methods for Analysis & Integration of Multi-dimensional Data Diversity SupplementR01MH105561 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI GUO, YING, KANG, JIAN · 2014 to 2024
$4.3M
Mechanisms of Alzheimer's Disease Progression in the Aging BrainR01AG062542 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI JAGUST, WILLIAM J. · 2019 to 2023
$4.2M
Scalable Bayesian methods for big imaging data analysisR01DA048993 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI JOHNSON, TIMOTHY D, KANG, JIAN · 2020 to 2024
$1.6M
Statistical tensor regression models for intracranial aneurysm growth predictionR01NS132766 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI fei jiang · 2024 to 2026
$1.6M
New Statistical Methods for Multicenter Multimodal Longitudinal Neuroimaging AnalysisR01AG061303 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI LI, LEXIN · 2019 to 2022
$1.5M
Development of Dynamic Resting State Functional Connectivity Machine Learning Framework for DementiaK25AG071840 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI fei jiang · 2022 to 2026
$701k
NIA NIH HHS K25 AG071840NIA NIH HHS R01 AG061303NIA NIH HHS R01 AG062542NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA048993NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH105561NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS132766
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Classical regression generally assumes that all subjects follow a common model with the same set of parameters. With ever advancing capabilities of modern technologies to collect more subjects and more covariates, it has become increasingly common that there exist subgroups of subjects, and each group follows a different regression model with a different set of parameters. In this article, we propose a new approach for subgroup analysis in regression modeling. Specifically, we model the relation between a response and a set of primary predictors, while we explicitly model the heterogenous association given another set of auxiliary predictors, through the interaction between the primary and auxiliary variables. We introduce penalties to induce the sparsity and group structures within the regression coefficients, and to achieve simultaneous feature selection for both primary predictors that are significantly associated with the response, as well as the auxiliary predictors that define the subgroups. We establish the asymptotic guarantees in terms of parameter estimation consistency and cluster estimation consistency. We illustrate our method with an analysis of the functional magnetic resonance imaging data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study.

Indexed as

Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development StudyFunctional magnetic resonance imagingGroup LassoHigh-dimensional regressionsSubgroup analysis

Identifiers

PMID40808798
PMCPMC12344502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.