ArticleStatistica Sinica2025
High-dimensional Subgroup Regression Analysis.
Article in Statistica Sinica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Classical regression generally assumes that all subjects follow a common model with the same set of parameters. With ever advancing capabilities of modern technologies to collect more subjects and more covariates, it has become increasingly common that there exist subgroups of subjects, and each group follows a different regression model with a different set of parameters. In this article, we propose a new approach for subgroup analysis in regression modeling. Specifically, we model the relation between a response and a set of primary predictors, while we explicitly model the heterogenous association given another set of auxiliary predictors, through the interaction between the primary and auxiliary variables. We introduce penalties to induce the sparsity and group structures within the regression coefficients, and to achieve simultaneous feature selection for both primary predictors that are significantly associated with the response, as well as the auxiliary predictors that define the subgroups. We establish the asymptotic guarantees in terms of parameter estimation consistency and cluster estimation consistency. We illustrate our method with an analysis of the functional magnetic resonance imaging data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.