Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40808785›Full record

ReviewAnnals of cardiothoracic surgery2025

Origin of prefabricated frozen elephant trunk.

Axel Haverich, Matthias Karck

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of cardiothoracic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Axel HaverichDepartment Cardiovascular, Transplantation and Thoracic Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Matthias KarckDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Medical Faculty, Karl Ruprecht University, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At first glance, the frozen elephant trunk (FET) appears as a disruptive innovation in aortic surgery. Like any important surgical innovations, however, be it a product or a procedure, the prefabricated, four-branched device has undergone a stepwise, iterative phase of development prior to its first clinical implantation in 2010. In parallel, the surgical procedure of aortic arch replacement itself has had to mature towards a level of quality and risk control to allow for refinement via a new device. These preparatory technical steps included mastering circulatory arrest, including brain and spinal cord protection, which required decisive innovation in extracorporeal circulation (ECC) management. In addition, patient selection with respect to age and risk factors, but also his or her underlying disease-aneurysm, dissection, atherosclerosis-has been optimized prior to the introduction of the prefabricated substitute for aortic arch replacement. Of utmost importance were those steps, taken by individual surgeons and institutions by use of self-fabricated substitutes, combining various commercially available devices. Thus, the frozen elephant technique, as applied today, did not crash into the armamentarium of unprepared aortic surgeons via device engineering and industrial product development alone. Instead, it resembles an evolutionary process, guided by a number of international institutions exploring preliminary approaches, and learning from each other via scientific exchange. This process, however, would have remained unthinkable without the tremendous advances in medical imaging via tomographic techniques, including their increasing resolution and 3D depiction. This communication will focus on the intermediary surgical steps and the technological advances between the prefabrication of the FET by the medical product industry and its first successful clinical application, as it is used today.

Indexed as

Aortic arch surgeryaortic dissectionfrozen elephant trunk (FET)

Identifiers

PMID40808785
PMCPMC12343155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.