ReviewAnnals of cardiothoracic surgery2025
Origin of prefabricated frozen elephant trunk.
Review in Annals of cardiothoracic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Frozen elephant trunk: a narrative review of global and temporal trends.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
At first glance, the frozen elephant trunk (FET) appears as a disruptive innovation in aortic surgery. Like any important surgical innovations, however, be it a product or a procedure, the prefabricated, four-branched device has undergone a stepwise, iterative phase of development prior to its first clinical implantation in 2010. In parallel, the surgical procedure of aortic arch replacement itself has had to mature towards a level of quality and risk control to allow for refinement via a new device. These preparatory technical steps included mastering circulatory arrest, including brain and spinal cord protection, which required decisive innovation in extracorporeal circulation (ECC) management. In addition, patient selection with respect to age and risk factors, but also his or her underlying disease-aneurysm, dissection, atherosclerosis-has been optimized prior to the introduction of the prefabricated substitute for aortic arch replacement. Of utmost importance were those steps, taken by individual surgeons and institutions by use of self-fabricated substitutes, combining various commercially available devices. Thus, the frozen elephant technique, as applied today, did not crash into the armamentarium of unprepared aortic surgeons via device engineering and industrial product development alone. Instead, it resembles an evolutionary process, guided by a number of international institutions exploring preliminary approaches, and learning from each other via scientific exchange. This process, however, would have remained unthinkable without the tremendous advances in medical imaging via tomographic techniques, including their increasing resolution and 3D depiction. This communication will focus on the intermediary surgical steps and the technological advances between the prefabrication of the FET by the medical product industry and its first successful clinical application, as it is used today.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.