ArticleAnnals of cardiothoracic surgery2025
Total aortic arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk in patients with Marfan syndrome.
Article in Annals of cardiothoracic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Frozen elephant trunk technique in redo aortic arch surgery: a step-by-step approach.Annals of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Mid-to-long-term outcomes of the frozen elephant trunk procedure in aortic pathology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of cardiothoracic surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Marfan syndrome (MFS) is a connective tissue disease which can lead to aortic aneurysm and dissection. The performance outcomes of total aortic arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk (FET) are not well known in these patients. This study summarizes our experience with FET in MFS. Methods: Between August 2001 and December 2021, 435 patients underwent FET at Hannover Medical School. Of these, 34 patients had MFS. The mean age was 43.3±11.9 years and 27 (79%) were male. The indication for surgery was aortic aneurysm in 1 (3%), acute aortic dissection in 12 (35%), and chronic aortic dissection in 21 (62%) patients. Results: All patients underwent total aortic arch replacement with FET. In addition, the following procedures were performed: conventional aortic root replacement (Bentall operation, n=8), valve-sparing aortic root replacement (David procedure, n=8), coronary artery bypass grafting (n=3), mitral valve surgery (n=2), and tricuspid valve surgery (n=1). Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and aortic cross clamp times were 270±87 and 139±69 minutes, respectively. Postoperatively, there were 2 (6%) disabling strokes, and 0 (0%) patients required permanent dialysis or suffered from permanent paraplegia, respectively. In-hospital mortality was 12% (n=4). The mean follow-up time was 8.4±5.9 years. The 1-, 5-, 10, and 15-year survival rates were 82%, 70%, 70% and 65, respectively. There were 18 (53%) re-interventions on the distal aorta. Mean time to re-intervention was 2.7±3.1 years. The majority of patients underwent open surgical repair (n=14, 77%), while only 4 (22%) had endovascular therapy. The freedom from distal aortic re-intervention at 1-, 5-, 10- and 15 years was 86%, 61%, 55% and 44%, respectively. Conclusions: The main indication for FET surgery in MFS is acute or chronic aortic dissection. Despite multiple concomitant procedures, early mortality was relatively low, suggesting that FET is feasible and effective to treat complex aortic pathology in MFS. However, our study showed a high incidence of distal aortic re-interventions, underscoring the progressive nature of the disease and the need for tailored long-term management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.