ArticleRegenerative therapy2025
Scalable production process development for NK cells targeting large-scale expansion.
Article in Regenerative therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived NK Cells as an Off-the-Shelf Platform for Cancer Immunotherapy: Opportunities, Challenges, and Clinical Translation.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2026Review
- Harnessing CAR-NK cells against multiple myeloma: current landscape and future directions.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Natural killer cells: gatekeepers of healthy aging in longevity medicine.Inflammation and regeneration · 2026Review
- Manufacturing cost analysis and exploratory economic evaluation of natural killer cell immunotherapy for paediatric solid tumors.Clinical & translational immunology · 2026Article
- iPSC-derived CAR-NK extracellular vesicles for non-small cell lung cancer: evidence, engineering, and translational barriers.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- State of the Art of CAR-NK Cell Therapy in Multiple Myeloma: A Comprehensive Review of Cell Sources and Target Antigens.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Natural Killer (NK) cells have attracted extensive attention as therapeutic agents for hematological malignancies and solid tumors. NK cell therapies carry a lower risk of Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD) in allogeneic transplantation, making them ideal candidates for "off-the-shelf" allogeneic cell therapies. However, the expansion culture of NK cells typically employs a scale-out strategy using a large number of culture vessels, making it still challenging to use NK cells as 'off-the-shelf' allogeneic cell therapies. While scalable, aerated stirred bioreactor could be an ideal approach, there have been no reports on culture evaluations specifically targeting iPCS-derived NK cells. Methods: We developed a process for expanding iPCS-derived NK cells using a stirred culture system. The NK cell stimulation process with agonist antibodies and expansion process were repeated, and the cell expansion and quality of iPCS-derived NK cells were evaluated. Scale-up factors were evaluated using an aerated stirred bioreactor, and process scale-up was performed from 1 L to 10 L bioreactors. Results: iPCS-derived NK cells showed higher cell expansion in stirred cultures than in static cultures. By repeated stimulation and expansion processes, iPCS-derived NK cells expanded 1000-fold with comparable cell expansion and quality. iPCS-derived NK cells could be scaled up from 1 L to 10 L aerated stirred bioreactors with comparable cell expansion and quality. Conclusions: Through systematic process evaluation and optimization, we demonstrated that iPCS-derived NK cells can be expanded in a scalable aerated stirred bioreactor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.