Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40808753›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2025

Improving the prediction of bitumen's density and thermal expansion by optimizing artificial neural networks with Optuna and TensorFlow.

Eli I Assaf, Xueyan Liu, Sandra Erkens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eli I AssafDelft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands.
Xueyan LiuDelft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands.
Sandra ErkensDelft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous work demonstrated that Random Forest Regressors (RFRs) could estimate the physical properties of bitumen using molecular descriptors derived from Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations, thereby reducing the need for computationally intensive simulations. However, due to their decision-tree structure, RFRs lack true predictive capabilities, particularly for interpolation and extrapolation beyond the training data. This study advances that foundation by employing Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), which-when properly trained-can capture complex relationships with greater continuity and generalizability. Beyond simply replacing RFRs, we develop a fully automated framework for constructing Machine Learning Models (MLMs) to predict density and thermal expansion coefficients of bitumen. Using Optuna for hyperparameter optimization, we ensure that the information extracted from MD simulations is utilized effectively. The resulting ANN models accurately reproduce MD-predicted densities, achieving R

Indexed as

Machine learningMolecular dynamicsNeural networksOptunaTensorFlow

Identifiers

PMID40808753
PMCPMC12344187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.