SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2025
An overview of the integration and development trends between arts and psychotherapy.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In the field of mental health, the integration of art and psychotherapy has become an important development direction. Its core mechanism lies in promoting individuals to achieve emotional release, cognitive reconstruction, and social function recovery through the creative expression of art forms, which has given rise to the important practical field of art therapy. This study aims to systematically sort out the research status and development trends in the field of art therapy from 2005 to 2024 through knowledge mapping analysis, providing references for theoretical innovation and practice standardization in this field. Methods: Based on the Web of Science core collection data sources, the CiteSpace bibliometric tool was used for knowledge mapping analysis of art therapy-related research. By searching keywords such as "Art Healing" and "Art Therapy," 1799 valid articles were finally included after strict screening. The analysis was carried out from multiple dimensions: basic information (changes in the number of publications, journal distribution, regional and author-institution distribution) and research content (keyword co-occurrence, cluster mining, and timeline deduction). Results: Art therapy research from 2005 to 2024 showed a phased growth characteristic, successively going through a germination period, a stable period, and a rapid development period. In terms of geographical distribution, Europe and the United States, represented by the United States and the United Kingdom, contributed 63% of the core literature. Research hotspots gradually shifted from early basic intervention research to the exploration of technological integration and ethical issues. It was also found that this field is highly related to multiple disciplines such as psychology and medicine, but there are limitations such as imbalanced development of cross-cultural theories. Discussion: Although significant progress has been made in the theory and practice of art therapy, there are still structural problems such as uneven development of cross-cultural theories, insufficient connection between technical applications and practice guidelines, and inadequate research coverage on special groups. Future research can focus on the in-depth integration of theory and practice, cross-cultural theoretical integration, construction of multi-dimensional evaluation systems, and application of virtual reality technology, providing new paths to promote theoretical innovation and practice standardization in art therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.