Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40808717›Full record

ReviewJournal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS2025

Prophylactic Mesh in Parastomal Hernia Prevention: Current Evidence.

Elisa Mäkäräinen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Elisa MäkäräinenGastrointestinal Surgery Department, Oulu University Hospital, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Parastomal hernia (PSH) is a common long-term complication following stoma creation. The incidence of PSH exceeds 50% in long-term follow-up of end colostomy patients, while it remains lower in ileostomies and ileal conduit urinary diversions. PSH prevention strategies are of interest due to the poor outcomes and high recurrence rates associated with PSH repair. Overview of Techniques to Prevent PSH: Various technical approaches have been explored to reduce the risk of PSH. However, none have shown consistent benefit toward reducing PSH rate without the use of prophylactic mesh. The keyhole mesh technique was the first to demonstrate a significant reduction in PSH rates in early trials, but larger randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have later questioned its efficacy. The modified keyhole technique, using a funnel-shaped mesh, has shown promising results in recent small studies, with lower PSH incidence and potentially reduced stomal prolapse rate. Other methods such as the Sugarbaker technique and use of biological meshes in PSH prevention have been evaluated as well, with mixed results. While most research focuses on end colostomy, there is limited data on PSH prevention in ileostomies and ileal conduits. Conclusion: Despite early enthusiasm, the keyhole technique has not proven to be effective in preventing PSH. The modified funnel-shaped mesh appears to be a promising development, though long-term outcomes are lacking. Preventive mesh placement is still supported by international guidelines; however, these recommendations are not widely followed in colorectal surgery departments. Thus, further research is essential to guide future recommendations for PSH prevention.

Indexed as

keyhole techniquemodified keyhole techniqueparastomal herniapreventionSugarbaker technique

Identifiers

PMID40808717
PMCPMC12343349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.